District Judge Wendy Lloyd has made what is alleged to be a malicious ‘wrong judgement‘ in Sefton Magistrates court.
It must be embarrassing for a judge to sit there, all high and mighty, all important and supposedly ‘knowledgeable of the criminal offence being heard’, only to find that a layman prosecutor actually had a better understanding of the law in question!
When a private prosecution was brought before DJ Wendy Lloyd by a member of the public (a litigant in person), seeking an application for a court summons for a person who had committed an act of malicious communications, Judge Wendy Lloyd said the crime was ‘out of time‘.
DJ Judge Wendy Lloyd fell at the first hurdle for not knowing legislation!
When the ‘layman’ (litigant in person) prosecutor politely informed DJ Judge Wendy Lloyd that she was incorrect and that the crime was, in fact, an ‘either-way offence‘ with a 2 year time limit, she incorrectly argued that it was out of time as it had surpassed 6 months but not 2 years.
Flushed at being gazumped by a civilian, DJ Wendy Lloyd, spat her dummy and continued to argue that it was out of time, not knowing that she was in front of other legal professionals who were likely laughing on the inside how foolish Lloyd was being.
When pushed by the layman prosecutor as to the legislation and the date in which it became ‘indictable’, she reluctantly ‘retired’ to the Judges Chambers at the advice of the court clerk, 10 minutes later, the layman prosecutor was called back before the judge who then admitted he was correct, BUT, DJ Judge Wendy Lloyd then changed her mind said the crime “did not have a realistic prospect of conviction“…
Gazumped again, DJ Wendy Lloyd used the “realistic prospect of conviction” test which is part of the CPS full code test, (read about it here) it is not to be used by a Judge, and most certainly not in a private prosecution which has nothing to do with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) who use this test, and has no such threshold test in a private prosecution case (unless the CPS get involved which they did not)
Judge Wendy Lloyd, twice in one hearing made what could likely be described as law student errors. She stood by her second decision even though it was totally wrong and the layman prosecutor was denied justice by DJ Wendy Lloyd who, in this case, did not have an understanding of the law for which she was making the decision!
UK Judges are not above the law.
Did she do it on purpose, probably, complain indeed the organisations dealing with complaints are just as sickening when it comes to complaints that bar council and ombudsman and OSS are just a vile group of criminals who cover for their own kind, it’s sickening to think when you complain about forged state documents the people taking on complaints do the same thing another bunch of corrupted slime bags, l know what l talk about l have dived in to that black and evil hole.
If this woman is not competent then complain.You can complain if you’re unhappy with a judge, magistrate, tribunal member or coroner’s:
behaviour
language
conduct
Contact the advisory committee for the area your court is in. You can ask a member of staff at court if you’re not sure which advisory committee to contact.
Judges sitting in other courts
This includes:
Crown Court judges
coroners
district judges
You can complain online on the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) website.
What a joke! She should resign as she is not fit for the job! shocking behaviour and ignorance for the law she is meant to govern with.
Wise judge
GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY THIS EXCUSE FOR A DISTRICT JUDGE WOULD RUIN MANY LIVES
GIVE IT UP WENDY WE WILL ALL CHEER AT YOUR LEAVING DO AND CONTRIBUTE TO YOUR LEAVING PRESENT
About as popular as maggie thatcher!
Dj wendy lloyd has just sentenced me, and sent me all over the north west for a vacation of plea, a mini trial was to be heard in relation to my reason for plea vacation, in paticular my legal rep who had to dismiss from my case due to vacation was known in Liverpool i had bad advice and was under the influence, she personally picked the judge to deal with me in another court and off to warrington i went. On arrival in warrington that rep was sitting in the very court room she sent me too so they decided to send it back to Liverpool where a outside of area judge refused my plea vacation, complete stitch up. That judge refused to sentence me and before you no it that afternoon judge lloyd is sentencing me. Im innocent she has ruined my career at 31. I will be apealing my conviction absolute joke of a judiciary system made 20 times worse by this woman…. i hope your reading this you no doubt you know who i am. You was fumming at plea vacation before you sent me to warrinton, i guess you wanted to finsish me off and i was presented on a plate…. see you soon i wont give up you ruined my life
The same happened to me with Wendy Lloyd. 3 day trial and she failed to listen to any of the evidence in my defence. On appeal the cop changed his evidence in order to ensure the conviction stood. Corrupt justice system 100%. Ruined my career!
This is one very arrogant lady, who is totally devoid of listening skills and knowledge of English law. She makes up her mind as she goes without thought and treats every one with contempt. At a time when the public don’t have much faith in the judicial system, she does not nothing at all to improve it, she does not deserve the status or title of District judge that’s a title that comes with respect, she does not deserve that. It’s about time she was put out to pasture.
WILL DJ LLOYD EVR LOOK AT THESE COMMENTS AND DO THE DECENT THING
IF SHE DID THIS WOULD BE A FIRST FOR HER SHE IS THE MOST ILL MANNERED MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY IN LIVERPOOL
ALMOST everyone who attends Liverpool Magistrates court has a better grasp of the basics of law than DJ Lloyd surely it is time for the MOJ to take notice
of why this lady is allowed in her ill mannered way she treats every one with contempt and is sadly lacking in good manners
everybody who attends at Liverpool magistrates court is aware of this District Judge’s lack of knowledge of the law perhaps this is why she wasn’t instructed
very often when in practise only ever as a last resort she is a figure of much mirth for her lack of the basics of English law perhaps its time the MOJ took a look at how many times she has been appealed successfully thus wasting the time of the Crown court in this time of austerity
I too have knowledge of DJ Wendy Lloyd and her arrogant behaviour, bad manners, and total disregard for the evidence put before her. Once she had made her mind up there is no swaying her no matter what the evidence presented shows. She hears what she wants to hear, and has no concept of the modern age. Yes she has a blackberry ( or at least she did in 2013), but does not understand wall paper as she couldn’t understand why a picture of a defendants cat was not on her Blackberry, which she fished from her bag and waved about. She also wanted to know why girls over the age of 18 didn’t, keep there money in their SOCKS, as opposed to their bra’s,!!!! Yes DJ Lloyd, Bobby socks were a 50’s thing, girls now go out with bare legs, beautifully tanned fron their local tanning studio. Yes with this archaic way of thinking I think retirement is calling and the sooner the better, before she ruins anybody else’s life.
Judge Wendy Lloyd also likes to kill elderly dogs. When are the people in her area going to get her removed from her position?
https://www.seniorstaffyclub.co.uk/justice-for-butch
Interesting reading especially as I have knowledge of another case where judge Wendy Loyd in my opinion made a dreadful ruling against all the evidence presented which was, to an eminent barrister, self evident. This resulted in a well respected professional losing his job.